|
Comments: 104 | Prop Total: 260 | Avg: 2.5
|
|
| Photo | Video | News | Wall | |
|
(Nov 2, 2009 at 16:07)
(Below Threshold) show comment
I like your styles!
|
|
|
|
haha your powers of ignorance know no bounds.
|
|
|
Get with the times, have some banter. You didn't put in a reasonable offer, it was a pisstake. ''slightly under'' is not the same as 40% less. If I'm honest, it's hard to take you seriously. Oh, and who's 14?
|
|
|
they're advertised at 500, they went for four-fifty. Can I recommend RST at Halfords?
|
|
|
I'd rather you stuck your boot up my arse than give me three hundred quid.
|
|
|
Proof - were it needed - that a can of Redbull costs farrrr too much.
|
|
|
yeah, if the price is right. please feel free to make an offer.
|
|
She doesn't look like she takes anything from 12 year old boys....
|
|
|
|
I'd be crying if it was the only way to get a damn bath.
|
|
|
|
It has fallen something out of fashion of late, ol' chap.
|
|
|
|
look at the back end. because the main pivot wraps around the bottom bracket, the distance between the BB and the back axle never changes through the travel of the rear sus. This is referred to as 'zero chain growth'. It means you can run singlespeed without needing a derailleur or chain tensioner and a chain with some slack in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you say so, guv'nor. Reckon on what got invented first (a bicycle or a motorcycle?) reckon on what belongs in a cycle lane, reckon on what olympic cycling involves, and tell me it's not all pretty self evident. If English is your first language I'm surprised we're having this conversation.
I'm not angry, to be honest it was good for the shits n giggles. |
|
|
It's a cycle with a motor attached. If you got 'quad'.....c'mon.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
no, an ''All Terrain Vehicle'' is a vehicle that is capable of crossing all terrain. 'Quad' is derived from the Latin for 'Four' - of course it has four f*cking wheels.
a cycle (BICYCLE, TRICYCLE, ANY KINDA CYCLE) works on legpower. Sometimes I wonder how you can maul a f*cking language so badly. Instead of spouting factually incorrect codshit, why not look it up or even just keep your ignorance to yourself? |
|
|
|
i've been following the forum thread, my man - and that's niiice.
|
|
|
i've been following the forum thread, man man - and that's niiice.
|
|
''homemade style''
my man, you just shot yourself. |
|
that's sick. if i could get that photo without the O in the corner i'd be down for printing it poster size.
|
|
i think that revision was pretty legit.
|
|
mathher13sanderson, make an effort to understand or ask in his language.
|
|
|
I dont know, we're all just speculating, right? - but if the forks were designed for 8" rotors I can't see how they would fail because of braking forces. If we had a brake that was really that strong, I think the rotor bolts would go 'pop' before the fork did. Think Levers
 |
|
|
so you think he rode down the hill backwards?
|
|
|
*salutes*
just a word of warning dude, cover your swingarm if you haven't already |
|
that's one of very few norcos that i really like the look of. nice, man.
|
|
RSS
